Goodreads The StoryGraph Book Depository Barnes and Noble IndieBound
Goodreads rating: 3.5 stars
Book content warnings: graphic murder descriptions, suicide
Summary in a quote:
“She didn’t know if she could love her own mangled, strange heart. She wanted someone else to do it for her, to see it beating behind her ribs and to say, I can see your true self. It is there, and it is rare and worthy. I love you.“
Follow me on Instagram
1. The plot and structure.
The only other book I’ve read by E. Lockhart is the forever glorified We Were Liars so I had some idea coming into this book that not all would be as it seemed. True to form, this author takes to heart the whole ‘subverting expectations’ endeavor. This novel is told in reverse chronological order which essentially results in the reader knowing what the consequences of the actions are before knowing the actual actions. I have semi-mixed feelings about this. On one hand, it made it a bit confusing to read and you have to keep a really steady timeline in your head. On the other hand, it fits the whole theme and vibe of the novel perfectly. Seriously. This is some serious peanut butter and jelly going on.
I’m going to keep it vague to avoid spoilers because this is E. Lockhart we’re talking about people! Basically, we get to dip inside the world of someone who wants to be loved and accepted and is willing to do whatever it takes to reach that goal. With the backwards chronology, we can see her slow descent into the consequences of her decisions so the emphasis is placed more on her own mentality, the steps she’s taking, and how they lead her to where she ends up at the beginning of the book. I think, as readers, we’re trained to place focus on the large, life-altering events and not so much on the quiet moments in between. In my opinion, those quiet moments are just as or even more important as those large events (of which there are multiple in this book).
Anyway, I’m rambling. I will say that some of the plot points themselves were a little far-fetched and strange. I loved how Jule dealt with the issues, but how they came to her attention were questionable. To sum up: love the plot structure in the end but not all of the actual plot. Great pie, not a great filling.
2. The characters.
I’m going to be honest here and say the only character I found interesting was Jule. The other characters were necessary, of course, but they didn’t do much for me, even though the author attempted some fleshing with the more important ones. They all just felt like stepping stones for Jule which, intellectually, I appreciate (aiding in this whole desperately searching for acceptance theme), but emotionally, it didn’t do much for me in terms of holding my attention and gaining my investment.
3. The romance.
This was interesting to me. At first, I really didn’t like that there was a romance involved at all. There are so many interesting things going on so I resented the page space given to this strange secondary plot. Towards the end, I was faced with this whole intellectual/emotional pull again. It’s a great way to explore this acceptance that Jule craves because in United States society at least, romantic love is prized as the highest form of happiness and acceptance. Realistically, though, it just felt like this extra little bit on the side that wasn’t really integral. It’s a nice romance and all, but it’s in that weird space where there’s simultaneously not enough and way too much page space allocated to it.
The Final Verdict
The experience reading wasn’t nearly as delightful as the experience contemplating once it was over. Ultimately, thematically intriguing while structurally unsound.
Would I reread?
Yes! While I didn’t love it, I’m fascinated by the structure the author chose and I think rereading it, knowing everything, could be fascinating.
I think E. Lockhart is definitely a talented writer and I would love to read more from her. I haven’t read this and I think I would find it super unique. Thanks for the review, Laura!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I completely agree, Emily! I think she really pays attention to the heart of a story and structures the book around a theme instead of around action. I hope you enjoy it if you end up reading it!
LikeLike
I agree! like I appreciated what she was trying to do, it just didn’t all click for me? And I agree about the characters- like maybe if I had been more invested in them, I’d have been more into the story as a whole? Great review!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes exactly! I so, so wanted to love it and there are plenty of lovely aspects, but as a package, it just didn’t do it for me. And I agree! It was hard to feel bad for the other characters because they could barely be classified as characters. Unless that was the point? If it was, it didn’t work I suppose. Thanks for stopping by, Shannon!
LikeLike
Not sure if I would enjoy this one or not but I love the cover!
LikeLiked by 1 person
The cover is gorgeous!
LikeLike
I am a bit of a cover snob and am super judgy about them even though we aren’t supposed to be. Oops.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha you and me both! I know we’re not supposed to judge a book by its cover but I definitely do and I’m completely not sorry 🤷🏼♀️
LikeLike
I definitely agree with you on everything you said. I was super-excited for this one because I loved We Were Liars, but it ended up being somewhat underwhelming. I read it really fast and enjoyed the ride for the most part, but it wasn’t particularly well-developed? For example, like you said, most of the characters were really boring and two-dimensional. 😦 Great review!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Right! I’m sorry you felt the same way. I feel like the author focused too much on the suspense and plot structuring and didn’t pay as much attention to all the rest of it. Thanks for stopping by, Vera!
LikeLiked by 1 person